Vachikinas v. Vachikinas
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MilleR, Judge:
The plaintiff’s right to a divorce a vinculo as sought by her bill was challenged by demurrer interposed, not by the defendant, not served with process except by order of. publication, but by the divorce commissioner of Marshall County.
The several grounds of demurrer assigned, in substance were: First, that as the hill alleges plaintiff and defendant were married in Russia, and that defendant left plaintiff there and moved to the United States and they never resided and cohabited together in this country or in this State, the desertion if any began in Russia, and not in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Squilache v. Tidewater Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Burk v. BurkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Pocahontas Colleries Co. v. Rukas' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alves v. AlvesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Farmers Mutual Insurance v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- White v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
- Parks v. ParksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
- Farmers Mutual Insurance v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.