Legal Opinion

Brophy v. Schuldner

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 19, 1997No. 96-3-AppealPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This ease came before the court for oral argument March 4, 1997, pursuant to an order that had directed both parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by the appeal should be decided at this time.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court that dismissed her complaint because service of process was not completed within a reasonable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caprio v. Fanning & Doorley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  2. Estate of Meller v. Adolf Meller Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  3. Curtis v. Diversified Chemicals & Propellants Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  4. Catone v. Multimedia Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  5. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re O'DonnellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  2. Ransom v. DaLombaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. McKenna v. PoissonSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API