Legal Opinion

Curtis Clayton v. Martin Biter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 2017No. 15-71566PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

After the district court dismissed Petitioner Curtis Clayton’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus as second or successive, he applied to this court, for permission to file a second or successive petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). Clayton’s habeas petition challenges the state court’s denial of his petition for resentencing under section 1170.126 of the California Penal Code. He argues that the state court’s adverse ruling deprived him of- a federally protected liberty interest without affording him procedural due process protections.

We review Clayton’s application…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Patrick Neiss v. Pete BludworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. Uriel Gonzalez v. Stuart ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Gregory Brown v. M. AtchleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. Alquandre Turner v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Jose BuenrostroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API