Legal Opinion
Padbury v. Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'n
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 25, 1954No. Civ. No. 4714PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, Chief Judge.
Four of the defendants, namely, Dairymen’s League Cooperative Association, Inc., Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers’ Mutual Fire Insurance Company, the Home Insurance Company of New York, and Royal Insurance Company, Limited, moved to dismiss this-action because of lack of jurisdiction in this Court. One of the defendants, Herman Rynveld’s Son Corp., has moved to dismiss the action on other grounds-. The motions came on for hearing and they are now before the Court for disr position.
Four of the defendants contend that there is not 'a complete diversity of citizenship…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown v. KeeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Everhart v. Huntsville CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Texaco-Cities Service Pipe Line Company and Clell Hedgpeth and Frank Stewart, D/B/A Hedgpeth and Stewart v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Padbury v. Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1954