Legal Opinion
Jones v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 18, 1947No. 47 C 1226PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LaBUY, District Judge.
Defendant has filed objections to Interrogatories 2, 3, 4, S, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 23 and 24 propounded by the plaintiff pursuant to Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil *663Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
Interrogatory 2 inquires whether plaintiff’s statement taken by defendant contains facts concerning the manner, place, time or cause of accident and injuries to the plaintiff and if so to attach copy of such statement to its answer. Defendant has objected to so much of the interrogatory as requires the production of plaintiff’s statement. Rule 33 makes no provision…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1952
- Walsh v. Pullman Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
- Chatman v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956