Legal Opinion

Hudson v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 12, 1996No. 24524PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

While an appeal was pending from the original jury trial, respondent’s motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1), SCRCP, was granted. Appellant now appeals the order granting that motion. Since respondent did not obtain leave from the appellate court to make the Rule 60(b)(1) motion, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we vacate the appealed order, which is void. See Rule 204, SCACR; cf., Bradley v. Hullander, 266 S.C. 188, 222 S.E.2d 283 (1976); Pinckney v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 311 S.C. 1, 426 S.E.2d 327 (Ct.App.1993) (trial court orders…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pinckney v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Bradley v. HullanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Goethe ex rel. Estate of Goethe v. ClelandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wachovia Bank of South Carolina, N.A. v. PlayerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API