Honeycutt v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant insists, in his motion for a rehearing, that in our original opinion we erred in holding that the voucher in question upon its face appeared to be a valid instrument which created pecuniary obligation on Gregg County. He bases his contentions on the following grounds: (a) because the County Treasurer failed to number it and failed to note thereon the day and month of registration, (b) because it is apparent from the face of it that the County Auditor did not himself approve it, but is merely approved by the Assistant Auditor.

While the…