Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Coward v. AC and S Inc

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 14, 2004No. 02-51175UnpublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. *

Garlock, Inc. (“Garlock”) appeals the district court’s Order granting Frederick and Verna Coward’s (the “Cowards”) “Motion for Just Costs, Actual Expenses, and Attorney Fees Under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1447(c)” in the amount of $10,367.44. For the reasons cited below we affirm in part, and reverse in part, and remand to the district court.

DISCUSSION

I. Jurisdiction

This Court has jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. In re Topco, Inc., 894 F.2d 727, 734 (5th Cir.1990).

II. Standard of Review

This Court reviews a district court=s award of counsel…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Jack Kline Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  2. In Re Nat. Century Fin. Enterpr., Inc., Inv. Lit.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
  3. Berry v. Pharmacia Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2004
  4. In Re ValdezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  5. In Re WilsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API