Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Medina v. Primm

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2007No. 78575-9Published

1Dissent

¶36 (dissenting) — The majority holds the city of Kirkland’s municipal court has jurisdiction over violations of the cities of Medina, Clyde Hill, or the town of Yarrow Point’s municipal codes. But jurisdiction is territorial. In re Crawford, 148 Wash. 265, 267, 268 P. 871 (1928). A municipal court is a court of limited jurisdiction, possessing only the jurisdiction affirmatively granted by statute. Smith v. Whatcom County Dist. Court, 147 Wn.2d 98, 104, 52 P.3d 485 (2002). And no statute grants Kirkland, or any other municipality, subject matter jurisdiction over alleged violations of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Smith v. Whatcom County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Smith v. Whatcom County Dist. CourtWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. McCall v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API