Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Hamilton

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1978No. Crim. 2888Published

1Dissent

*136BROWN (G. A.), P. J. I dissent.

This case is being reversed upon the tenuous ground that the jury was not instructed that to return a verdict of guilty it had to find defendant knew he was involved in the accident. There is no question that to find a person guilty of felony hit-and-run driving it is essential that the driver knows that he was involved in an accident. My disagreement comes with the conclusion of the principal opinion that the jury did not receive adequate instructions on this concept.

It is elemental that instructions must be viewed and construed in a common sense manner and as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Westover v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McShane v. CleaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API