Legal Opinion

Brumley v. Robinson

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohalan, J.

The plaintiffs, who are stockbrokers, sue on two promissory notes, which on their face draw no interest, one for $5,100, the other for $5,000, both made and delivered to them by the defendant. The defense is lack of consideration and usury.

The defendant had a marginal account with the plaintiffs, and through them as his brokers, for a period of about four years, bought and sold stocks in the usual marginal manner, the defendant putting up a certain amount of money for margin and the plaintiffs supplying the difference between the margin and the cost of the certificates and charging the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosenstein v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Wright v. . ToomeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Wright v. ToomeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Hawley v. KountzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gelb v. Zimet Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In re the Accounting of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  3. Simpson Factors Corp. v. LipmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API