Legal Opinion

Mednick Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1961No. Appeal, No. 162PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This is an appeal from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review which held that the claimant, Bernard Mednick, was disqualified from receiving benefits under the provisions of section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS 802(b)(1).

Section 402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law,, supra, provides: “An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week— ... (b) (1) In which, his unemployment is due to voluntarily leaving work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. ...”

The claimant here was the owner of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Hamburg Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Murray Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Starinieri Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. DePriest Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Hanmer v. Department of Industry Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. DIR., DEPT. OF INDUS. REL. v. FordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Lazar v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMPLOY. SEC'YNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API