Ofili v. Osco Drug, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
The issue presented by this case is whether the notice of intent to sue on an action for medical injury (contained in Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (1987)) is required to be served by certified or registered mail pursuant to the statute. We hold that it is and affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the cause of action with prejudice due to the lack of proper service.
On May 1, 1986, the appellant, Francisca Ofili, received a prescription for Indocin (for pain) from her doctor. Her husband, Joseph, took the prescription to appellee, Oseo Drug, to be filled; the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gay v. RabonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Dawson v. GerritsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pugh v. GriggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Weidrick v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Travis v. HoukSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Cox v. BardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Lambert Ex Rel. Brown v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.