Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 3, 1934No. Docket No. 64023Published

A husband and wife held several pieces of real estate at the time of the husband's death, either as joint tenants or as tenants by the entirety, in some of which the wife had acquired a joint legal interest from her husband and in some of which she had acquired a legal interest jointly with him at the same time that he had acquired his interest.

Read the full summary

A husband and wife held several pieces of real estate at the time of the husband's death, either as joint tenants or as tenants by the entirety, in some of which the wife had acquired a joint legal interest from her husband and in some of which she had acquired a legal interest jointly with him at the same time that he had acquired his interest. Held that in computing the value of the gross estate of the husband no part of the value of the property may be excepted, under the provisions of section 302(e), Revenue Act of 1926, as the evidence does not show that the wife furnished some certain…

1Opinion of the Court

AMY S. RICHARDSON, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES W. RICHARDSON, DECEASED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Richardson v. Commissioner

Docket No. 64023.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

31 B.T.A. 245; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1129;

October 3, 1934, Promulgated

A husband and wife held several pieces of real estate at the time of the husband's death, either as joint tenants or as tenants by the entirety, in some of which the wife had acquired a joint legal interest from her husband and in some of which she had acquired a legal interest jointly with him at the same time that he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richardson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API