Legal Opinion

Irving Eugene Ney v. State of California, Lawrence F. Pickett, Keith C. Sorenson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1971No. 26516_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

439 F.2d 1285

Irving Eugene NEY, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Lawrence F. Pickett, Keith C. Sorenson, et al., Appellees.

No. 26516.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 25, 1971.

Rehearings Denied April 20, 1971.

Irving Eugene Ney, in pro. per.

Michael J. Brady, of Ropers, Majeski, Kohn, Bentley & Wagner, Redwood City, Cal., Donald W. Malouf, of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before HAMLEY, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

1

Ney is a prisoner of the State of California, having been convicted of mayhem (Cal.Pen.C. §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API