Legal Opinion

Ulmer v. Seelman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1909No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Ottawa; Padgham, J. Trespass vi et armis by John Ulmer against John Seelman. A judgment for defendant is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant for damages for personal injuries inflicted upon him by defendant, who, he charges, seriously assaulted him with stones, breaking a rib, and otherwise injuring him permanently. Defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice of self-defense in justification. That an altercation occurred between these parties, and that plaintiff’s rib was broken and his face bruised by stones thrown at him by defendant, does not appear to be disputed.

These men. were farmers in Ottawa, county, living on farms a few miles apart. There had been some bad feeling…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FossMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Walker v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cornell v. FidlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API