Mayes v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.
The indictment was in three counts. The first charged the defendants with manufacturing whisky, and the second and third with the unlawful possession of a still, etc. There was a general verdict of guilt as to each defendant. The defendants requested, in writing, the general charge separately as to each count of the indictment and generally as to the entire indictment. Thesé several charges were requested upon the theory (1) there was not sufficient evidence to connect the defendants with the crime; (2) that the venue was not in Dekalb county.
The record certainly fails to disclose any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tidwell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Doe ex dem Miller v. CullumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
- Winchester v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Brasher v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Cole v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- State v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1955