Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Harris

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is a bill in equity brought to restrain the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff’s alleged right to take water from a spring on the defendants’ premises.

The bill alleges that the plaintiff on April 25, 1925, was the owner of a farm upon which was situated a farm house; that on that date he conveyed to the"defendants by warranty deed a portion of the premises, including that part upon which the farm house was located; that the plaintiff has adjoining the land conveyed a tract known as the “Bungalow Lot” on which is situated a bungalow designed as a summer *501dwelling; that upon the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wintersmith & Young v. Pointer & ConwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  2. Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Orpin v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Gorton-Pew Fisheries Co. v. TolmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Owen v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Zimmerman v. Union Paving Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Bond v. OrrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Tindley v. Department of Environmental Quality EngineeringMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API