Legal Opinion
CHARLES Q. v. Constantine
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 4, 1995PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
The question presented is whether respondent’s determination dismissing petitioner from his employment as a State Trooper must be annulled because some of the evidence admitted at the disciplinary hearing was obtained through a court order which erroneously unsealed petitioner’s criminal records from the related criminal proceeding which resulted in his acquittal. We conclude that annulment is not required under the facts of this case.
In March 1991, criminal and disciplinary proceedings were commenced against petitioner, a State Trooper, based on allegations…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Sowa v. LooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- New York State Police v. Charles Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pritzker v. City of HudsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Moore v. DorminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. La FontaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- City of Elmira v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.