Legal Opinion
Averill v. Wood
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff alleges that on November 18, 1887, he was induced to take of Isaac W. Wood, in payment of real estate sold to said Wood, two certain promissory notes, as follows:
“ $500.00. Grand Rapids, Mich., Dec. 22, 1885.
“Three months after date, for value received, the Newaygo Manufacturing Co. promise to pay to the order of Isaac W. Wood five hundred and no-100 dollars, at Old National Bank, Grand Rapids.
“No. 258. Newaygo Manufacturing Co.,
“ By A. J. Daniels, Vice Prest.
“ Countersigned by G. H. Hobart, Treas.”
Upon the back of said note are the following indorsements:
“Rec’d by bill rend.…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Lumley v. Wabash R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Wagner v. National Life Ins. Co. of MontpelierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Sioux City Stock Yards Co. v. Sioux City Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.