Legal Opinion

Baptist General Convention v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1929No. 17959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

C. H. Wright, one of the defendants in error, plaintiff below, commenced an action in the district court of Oklahoma county, Okla., against the Baptist General Convention of the State of Oklahoma, Inc., F. M. McConnell, and C. P. Stealey, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, to recover $2,850 balance of unpaid rent due the plaintiff from the defendants.

For brevity the parties will b'e referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff, for his cause of action against the defendants in the court below, says:

“Comes now the plaintiff, and for cause of action against the defendants,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. ShirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
  2. Lunsford v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Orcutt v. IshamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  4. Parke v. ProbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  5. First State Bank of Keota v. WadleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Merritt v. TagueMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Abbott v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Birchfield v. EedsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Bolding v. ClantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API