Legal Opinion

Story & Clark Organ Co. v. Rendleman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 7, 1896Published

Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Appeal from the County Court of Union County; the Hon. Monroe C. Crawford, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the August term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scofield

delivebed the opinion of the Court.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict can not be questioned in this court, for the reason that no exception to the action of the court below in overruling the motion for a new trial has been preserved by bill of exceptions.

The sufficiency of the second plea of Frank and Henry Eendleman can not be questioned, for the reason that appellant, instead of abiding its demurrer when the same was overruled, replied to the plea and went to trial upon the issues thus joined, and did not raise the question of the sufficiency of the plea thereafter by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayer v. LawrenceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API