Legal Opinion

Ultrashmere House, Ltd. v. 38 Town Associates

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

The key issue on the motions before the court (Nos. 146 and 147 on the calendar of Oct. 7,1983) is whether a lease provision barring consolidation of actions should be enforced.

Plaintiff moves for leave to serve an amended complaint following dismissal of its complaint and to consolidate the within action with another instituted by defendant against *103the plaintiff to recover unpaid rent, now pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County.

The complaint herein seeking rescission and damages alleges that the defendant fraudulently induced plaintiff to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Colson v. PelgramNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Mideal Homes Corp. v. L & C Concrete Work, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Bomze v. Jaybee Photo Suppliers, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1983
  4. Earbert Restaurant, Inc. v. Little Luxuries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Del Bello v. WilmotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waite v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Lipkis v. GilmourAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API