Legal Opinion

Philip A. DeMassa, APC v. Butler (In Re MacIntyre)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1995No. BAP No. SC-93-2071-RHJ. Bankruptcy No. 92-02840-M7. Adv. No. 92-90403-M7PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUSSELL, Bankruptcy Judge:

This appeal arises from a complaint seeking to have the debtors’ discharge denied based on alleged fraudulent conduct by the debtors. The bankruptcy court ruled in favor of the debtors and granted the debtors a discharge. 1

The appellants, Philip A. DeMassa and his professional corporation (“DeMassa”) moved to file an oversize brief exceeding the normal page limits set forth in BAP Rule 5(b). 2 Attached with that motion was a copy of DeMassa’s oversized brief, which was sixty pages in length and contained twenty-eight footnotes. The motion was denied.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kano v. National Consumer Cooperative BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. v. United States Trustee (In Re Martech USA, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Brook v. McCormleyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API