Legal Opinion
Fishman v. Fishman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 20, 1950No. Appeal, No. 41PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal by plaintiff from the action of the court below in sustaining preliminary objections to her complaint in divorce.
The complaint in paragraph 2 contained the following averment: “The residence of the plaintiff is No. 101 S. Rhode Island Avenue Apartment 2, in the County of Atlantic, State of New Jersey.”
It was also averred therein that defendant was a citizen of the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and resided at 7643 Over brook Avenue, Philadelphia.
Defendant, under Pa. R. C. P. No. 1125 (b), 12 PS Appendix, raised the question of. jurisdiction by preliminary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huston v. HustonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Starr v. StarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Hilyard v. HilyardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Masefield v. MasefieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Chidester v. ChidesterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sargent v. SargentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Moore v. Moore, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Perry County1955
- Stottlemyer v. Stottlemyer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1972
- Stottlemyer v. StottlemyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Taylor v. Taylor, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.