Legal Opinion

Pleasant Township v. Cook

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1903No. 19,829PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Laporte Circuit Court; J. G. Richter, Judge. Petition of "William E. Cook and others to establish a ditch. Erom an order striking out the motion of Pleasant civil township to set aside the assessment as to the township, and for leave to file remonstrance, the township appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This proceeding was commenced October 10, 1900, in the court below, for the construction of a ditch under the drainage law of 1885 and the amendment of 1889. §§5622-5631, 5644-5646 Burns 1894.,

Appellant was made a party to said petition on account of the alleged benefit to “the highway” in said township, but no particular highway -was described. Notice was given of the filing of said petition and of the time when the same *534would be heard. The petition alleged that the proper work to accomplish such drainage would affect the following lands in Porter county, Indiana, to wit: “Also the highway…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hoefgen v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Goodwine v. LeakIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murray v. GaultIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McDonald v. State ex rel. KeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Board of Commissioners v. SummyIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lake Shore Sand Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API