Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Seville

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 15, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

Plaintiffs' lessors leased from the defendant owner a store on the ground floor of the premises in question, which store extended beyond the rear wall of the building, making what is known as an extension, in the roof of which there were two skylights, and they in turn sublet the front easterly half of that space to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs neither leased nor had access to said extension. The evidence shows that rain found its way into plaintiffs’ portion on June fifteenth after the place had been closed for the night, and this condition was not discovered until the following morning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schick v. FleischhauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Cook v. . SouleNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Lichtig v. PoundtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenthal v. SevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API