Biesecker v. Dean

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in a negligent action in which the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff Mark Allen Biesecker.

The error claimed is (1) failure to grant defendant a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, (2) error in giving two instructions, and (3) the verdict was excessive.(1)Defendant was not entitled to a directed verdict.

Defendant contends he was entitled to a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s case. After setting forth the motion of the defendant for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant states:

This…