Legal Opinion

State v. Zeimer

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1960No. 9013Published

1Opinion of the Court

10 Utah 2d 45 (1960)

347 P.2d 1111

STATE OF UTAH, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,

v.

JACK ZEIMER, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

No. 9013.

Supreme Court of Utah.

January 5, 1960.

A. Jerry Butler, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Walter L. Budge, Atty. Gen., Vernon B. Romney, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

McDONOUGH, Justice.

From the granting of a new trial solely on the issue of whether he was an habitual criminal, and from the instructions to the jury on that issue, defendant appeals. Defendant contends that the court cannot grant a new trial solely on the issue of prior convictions because the jury which…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  3. State v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Shargaa v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  5. State v. ZeimerUtah Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API