Legal Opinion

Moules v. Heckler

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 3, 1984No. C-83-1155 RPAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

AGUILAR, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3) seeking judicial review of the adverse decision of the Secretary of H.H.S. denying plaintiff’s application for disability benefits. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment or, alternatively, to remand this case for further administrative proceedings because the Secretary used improper procedures and standards in reaching her decision. The Secretary makes a cross-motion for summary judgment.

The issue before this Court is whether the Secretary’s decision is supported by “substantial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Alexandria S. Day v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Patricia A. Mitchell v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. Lightfoot v. MathewsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. William A. Pemberton v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. William A. Pemberton v. RRRBCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API