Legal Opinion

Swift & Given's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the decree of the Court of Common Pleas, No. 4, of Philadelphia county, sitting in equity: Of January-Term, 1885, No. 130. The bill of complainants, Caroline Swift and Hannah Given, sets forth that complainants are seized in fee of a certain lot of ground or messuage, with the three-story brick dwelling house erected thereon, situate on the south side of Ontario street, at the distance of 160 feet westward from the west side of Twenty-second street, in the city…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the decree of the Court of Common Pleas, No. 4, of Philadelphia county, sitting in equity: Of January-Term, 1885, No. 130. The bill of complainants, Caroline Swift and Hannah Given, sets forth that complainants are seized in fee of a certain lot of ground or messuage, with the three-story brick dwelling house erected thereon, situate on the south side of Ontario street, at the distance of 160 feet westward from the west side of Twenty-second street, in the city of Philadelphia, containing in breadth 100 feet, and in depth 225 feet, to Bellevue street, and having a front on that…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mercur

In the location and construction of a railroad the Act of 19th February, 1849, prohibits the corporation from passing through, inter alia, “ any dwelling house in the occupancy of Hie owner or owners thereof, without his, her, or their consent.” This language must be so construed as to give a reasonable effect to the purpose and intent of the statute.

It certainly does not mean that the prohibition extends only to preventing the railroad from actually passing “ through ” the dwelling house. When the latter is occupied by the owner thereof, the statute gives it all the protection necessary for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lothrop v. MarbleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Tanner v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Pfeiffer v. General Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1960
  4. Damon v. Balt. & Phil. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  5. Westside Electric Street Ry. Co. v. West Penn Power Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API