Legal Opinion

Horstkotte v. Menier

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1872PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from, St. Louis Circuit Court. cited Wagn. Stat. 909--911, §§ 8-10, 20. cited Walkenhorst v. Coste et al., 33 Mo. 401; Schaeffer v. Lohman, 34 Mo. 68 ; Miller v. Eoulk et al., 47 Mo. 262.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge

This was a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Defendant Higgs was the owner of the property. One Hodge was the original contractor with Higgs for the erection of the building, and defendants Menier and R. H. Horstkotte were sub-contractors under Hodge for doing the brick-work • on the building, and, as such, bought from plaintiff the brick used in erecting-the house ; and the plaintiff filed his lien for these materials, and this suit is brought upon this lien. The defendants, by their answers, denied indebtedness, etc.

After the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the defendants asked the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schaeffer v. LohmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
  2. Walkenhorst v. CosteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
  3. Miller v. FaulkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Walker's Administrator v. DeaverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Bensieck v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Butler v. LawsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  4. Zach McGuire v. Kenoma, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Holland v. CunliffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API