Diaz v. Eminent Associates, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered January 4, 2006, which denied the motion of defendant Eminent Associates (Eminent) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, or alternatively, for contractual indemnification against defendant Go Pro Sports, affirmed, without costs.
The record discloses issues of fact as to whether Eminent negligently repaired the sidewalk where plaintiff allegedly fell (see Hausser v Giunta, 88 NY2d 449, 452-453 [1996]), and the documentary evidence submitted by Eminent does not conclusively establish that the repair was undertaken…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hausser v. GiuntaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Barraco v. First Lenox Terrace AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- O'Callaghan v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- DeRoche v. Methodist HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Esteva v. CatsimatidisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Castillo v. Cannon Point South, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- Jennings v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025