Legal Opinion

Ohio Edison Co. v. Williams, 23530 (9-26-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2007No. 23530PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made:

{¶ 1} Appellant, Diana Williams, appeals the trial court's denial of her motion to vacate default judgment and the garnishment order issued against her and in favor of Appellee Ohio Edison Company by the Summit County Court of Common Pleas.

{¶ 2} On October 6, 1998, Appellee, Ohio Edison Co. ("Ohio Edison") filed a complaint against Appellant for amounts due on an account for residential electrical service. The complaint and summons were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kremer v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Ballard v. O'DonnellOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Harkai v. Scherba Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Rogers v. United Presidential Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Courie v. AlcoaOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. M.S. v. Toth, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth District, Medina County2017
  2. First Communications, L.L.C. v. HelmsOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Huber v. Inpatient Med. Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. In re DurkinOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. J.P. v. M.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API