Muse v. Muse
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEbvin, J.
When no matter of law or legal inference is involved, the granting or refusing a new trial upon all or any one of the issues rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. G.S. 1-207; Hawley v. Powell, 222 N.C. 713, 24 S.E. 2d 523; Campbell v. Laundry, 190 N.C. 649, 130 S.E. 638; Billings v. Observer, 150 N.C. 540, 64 S.E. 435; Jarrett v. Trunk Co., 144 N.C. 299, 56 S.E. 937; Benton v. Collins, 125 N.C. 83, 34 S.E. 242, 47 L.R.A. 33; McIntosh on North Carolina Practice and Procedure in Civil Cases, section 611. The record does not indicate that the judge abused his discretion in setting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Jarrett v. High Point Trunk & Bag Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Campbell v. . LaundrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Billings v. Charlotte ObserverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Campbell v. Model Steam LaundrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Poniros v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Poniros v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Muse v. MuseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Hunt v. CranfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960