Legal Opinion
Faragiano v. Town of Concord
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 2001PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*777OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, plaintiffs’ motion to amend their amended complaint denied, defendant Town’s cross motion for partial summary judgment on its second affirmative defense for apportionment under CPLR article 16 granted and the certified question answered in the negative.
Seventeen-year-old plaintiff Paul Faragiano was injured when a Jeep in which he was a passenger veered off the road, rolled over several times and struck a camper parked nearby. Faragiano, by his guardian, commenced this action against, among…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lopes v. RostadNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rangolan v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rangolan v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Margan v. NilesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Salamone v. Wincaf Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Clark v. N-H Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Grant v. OreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.