Legal Opinion

United States v. Laudani

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 31, 1944No. 71PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Indictments returned in a United States District Court in New Jersey charged that the respondent Laudani, while acting as a company foreman with authority to employ and discharge workers on a public works project financed in part by the United States, had contrary to § 1 of an Act of June 13,1934, 1 forced certain of his subordinates to give him part of their wages in order to keep their jobs. Lau-dani moved to quash, assigning as one ground that the indictments failed to charge conduct prohibited by this Act since they did not contain allegations that he was the employer of the coerced men…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. LaudaniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. NardelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. United States v. CarboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API