Legal Opinion

Augostini v. Lasky

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David F. Lee, Jr., J.

The plaintiffs move for a summary-judgment. Their complaint asks that:

1. The court take jurisdiction of this action.

2. The court declare unconstitutional and illegal the present representation and voting procedure of the Board of Supervisors of Broome County.

3. The court enjoin the defendants from acting in their present capacity as the Board of Supervisors until such time as a legal and constitutional board is created.

4. The court declare illegal and void any action heretofore and hereafter taken by the present Board of Supervisors as being unconstitutional and in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. TawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bianchi v. GriffingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  2. Town of Greenburgh v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Graham v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Dona v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hinton v. ThreetDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API