Legal Opinion

Katzenberger v. Leedom

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

RROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes., J.

1Opinion of the Court

McEaelaitb, Sp. J.

This is an action of re-plevin for certain carpets and other personalty sold in July and August, 1894, by Thos. L. Jieedom & Co., of Bristol, Pa., to one L. D. Harris, then doing business in ■ Memphis, Tenn. The sale was upon time, the last bill sold on August 30, 1894, by Ijeedom & Co., and maturing on September 25, 18.94, the total amount of goods which were not paid for amounting to $1,287.78.

*146On October 31/ 1894, L. D. Harris made what is called a partial assignment to L. Katzen-berger, trustee, of his stock of goods, iron safe, and trade fixtures in his store house in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Kline v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Thompson v. RoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
  4. Hennequin v. . NaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  5. Pike v. WietingNew York Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keith v. Murfreesboro Livestock Market, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  2. Richardson v. VickTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. J. W. Kelly & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API