Legal Opinion
Paul McGann v. Cinemark USA Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 6, 2017No. 16-2160PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RESTREPO, Circuit Judge.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., requires public 1 accommodations, including movie «theaters, to furnish auxiliary aids and services, which include qualified interpreters, to patrons with vision, hearing, and speech disabilities. Plaintiff-Appellant. Paul McGann, who is blind and deaf, requested from Defendant-Appellee Cine-mark USA, Inc. (“Cinemark”) an American Sign Language (“ASL”) tactile interpreter so that he could experience a movie in his local Cinemark theater during one of its regular showings.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Stenberg v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Meese v. KeeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Guillermo Robles v. Dominos Pizza LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Traci Berardelli v. Allied Services Institute of RCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Clientron Corp. v. Devon It, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Maria Childress v. Fox AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Miguel Luna Perez v. Sturgis Pub. Schs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.