Legal Opinion

People v. Alicea

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1969PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The judgment appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered. The value of the stolen article under the applicable statute (former Penal Law, § 1305; see new *687Penal Law, § 155.20, suM. 1) is “ the price at which * * * [it] would probably have been sold in the regular course of business at the time when and the place where * * * [it was] stolen ” (People v. Irrizari, 5 N Y 2d 142, 146). The insurance payment, indefinite in amount, which complainant received for his automobile was insufficient to prove that such value at the time of the theft was at least $500. Without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whelan v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Watts v. Phillips-Jones Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Watts v. Phillips-Jones CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. People v. VandenburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. HoughtalingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Buck v. Allied Chemical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. People v. MedjdoubiNew York Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API