Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1964No. 36903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICE, Commissioner.

The offense is unlawful possession of a dangerous drug; the punishment, sixty days in jail.

The recognizance appearing in the record is shown to have been entered into by the appellant and only one surety. Art. 831, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., which prescribes the form of a misdemeanor recognizance on appeal, provides that the recognizance be entered into by the defendant and two sureties.

The recognizance, not being in substantial compliance with the statute, is in* sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court. Price v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 312, 299 S.W.2d 141; Wilkins v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Aguillar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Giacona v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Etchieson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Etchieson v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API