Legal Opinion

Goddard v. Peeples

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1895No. 932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Raines. Tried below before Hon. E. W. Terhune.

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted by W. D. Peeples upon a note for $100, executed by J. C. Rhodes to N. L. Cole, as part consideration for a tract of land. The suit was against Rhodes, and N. L. Cole, as endorser, and sought a foreclosure of the vendor’s lien upon the tract of land in part payment of which it was given. J. H. Goddard was made a party defendant in the suit, upon the allegation that he also held a note executed by Rhodes as part consideration for the land, and that the same was a co-ordinate lien with that asserted by the plaintiff. The cause was tried below…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. W. M. Cason & Bro. v. ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Monticello & Port Jervis Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Brick v. BuelTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Borschow v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Day v. Van Horn Trading Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API