Legal Opinion

Spunar v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 4, 1977No. 63129PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE DOWNING

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an interlocutory appeal from the grant of a “temporary injunction,” which was predicated upon a violation of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 121½, par. 261 et seq.) (hereinafter Act). Plaintiff, Letitia Spunar, instituted this class action against defendant, Clark Oil & Refining Corporation, and Clark Super 100, a Clark service station, for purported deceptive practices. Without reaching the question of whether plaintiff had presented a proper class, the court below…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grillo v. Sidney Wanzer & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Ambassador Foods Corp. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  3. Mars, Inc. v. Curtiss Candy Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Summit Electric Co. v. MayrentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Edgewater Construction Co. v. Percy Wilson Mortgage & Finance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hydroaire, Inc. v. SagerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Baal v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Postma v. Jack Brown Buick, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People Ex Rel. Difanis v. FutiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Del Bianco v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API