Legal Opinion

Ohio Loan Co. v. Porychuk

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1935No. 14564PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LIEGHLEY, PJ.

First, defendants filed, a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the case here is not one cognizable in equity.

The first cause of action was dismissed by plaintiff in the trial court and the case proceeded upon the second cause of action for foreclosure. The trial court had jurisdiction of the parties and the, subject matter as a chancery proceeding, and was authorized to enter a decree of foreclosure.

It is claimed here that because no question is raised as to the lien and right of foreclosure and for the reason that it is only a question of amount, the case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartsfield Co. v. DemosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kramer v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API