Legal Opinion

Brady v. Blittner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered April 9, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, imposed sanctions upon plaintiffs’ counsel in the amount of $10,000, based upon counsel’s frivolous conduct in prosecuting the underlying litigation, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

As the record discloses that the instant action against defendants Carlyle Realty and Murray Silver was commenced by plaintiffs’ counsel without legal basis, the motion court’s imposition of sanctions against plaintiffs’ counsel constituted a proper exercise of discretion (22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [a]).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benefield v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API