Legal Opinion
Liner v. Ward
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 3, 1991No. 88 Civ. 1737 (RPP)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Defendant Harry Brook (“Officer Brook”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On July 31, 1989, this Court rendered a decision in this pro se action granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 as to Sergeant O’Neal, Commissioner Ward and the City of New York, but denying it as to Officer Brook. 1988 WL 88700, 1989 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 8797.
The grounds for denial of Officer Brook’s motion was the allegation of plaintiff Joshua Liner (“Liner”), supported by several…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Louis Batista, Manuel Padin and Felix Padin, Jr. v. Michael Rodriguez, Robert J. Nadrizny and the City of Bridgeport, the City of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roundtree v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Vazquez v. MarcianoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Woods v. CandelaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Mitchell v. WashingtonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Ravines de Schur v. Unified Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.