Legal Opinion

Murley v. Wiedamann

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 2009No. 2D08-2864PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRENSHAW, Judge.

Jan L. Murley (the Former Wife) appeals the final judgment of dissolution of her marriage to Karl E. Wiedamann (the Former Husband) and the order requiring her to pay fifty percent of the expenses on the parties’ jointly-owned Naples condominium beyond the date of the final judgment and interest on amounts owed to the Former Husband. 1 We reverse and remand for further proceedings because the trial court misinterpreted the plain language of the parties’ prenuptial agreement in determining that the Former Wife’s stock and stock options were marital property. We conclude that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knott v. Revolution Software, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. ROYAL OAK LANDING HOME-OWNER'S ASS'N v. PelletierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Talbott v. First Bank Florida, FSBDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Perez-Gurri Corp. v. McLeodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. MDS (Canada), Inc. v. Rad Source Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
  4. Heiny v. HeinyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Nabbie v. Orlando OutletDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API