Legal Opinion

State v. Tate

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 4, 1936No. 33999PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

The defendant Albert Tate was tried •twice on an information charging that he “did wilfully, maliciously and feloniously blow up and destroy by the use of an explosive substance, to-wit: dynamite, a certain cotton gin near the Town of Marks-ville, Louisiana,” etc. On the first trial •the jury was unable to reach a verdict, 'but on the second trial the defendant was •convicted, and is now prosecuting this appeal from the conviction.

The appeal comes up to this court on •eighteen bills of exception, embracing defendant’s complaints of error committed in •the district court. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NicelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Commonwealth v. BubnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. State v. McClellanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. State v. NewhouseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  5. State ex rel. Broussard v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Greer)California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. State v. BrittonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Sinclair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. State v. DallaoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API