Legal Opinion

Nugent v. Erb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to assess a drain tax. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

Eelator asks for a mandamus to compel the respondent, who is supervisor of his township, to assess a drain tax.. The relator is county drain commissioner. The supervisor refuses to assess the tax on account of certain defects in the proceedings to lay out the drain. Among other defects claimed are the following:

1. That the order of the commissioner determining the practicability of the drain does not establish the commencement, route, width, length, or depth of the proposed drain.

2. That the papers were not filed with the county clerk until January, 1891, while the order required the.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kroop v. FormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hillsdale County Senior Services, Inc v. Hillsdale CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Romulus City Treasurer v. Wayne County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Romulus City Treasurer v. Wayne County Drain CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Laubach v. O'MearaMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Scholtz v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API